www.AstroMax.com
Up Abstract I. Purpose II. Background III. Orbits IV. Period Determination V. Methods VI. Kepler's Laws VII. Observing Suggestions VIII. Data Gathering IX. Data Processing X. Observer's Data Results XI. Other Quad-A Results XII. Conclusions XIII. Attachments
This Project Jupiter Report
was prepared by
Mizar Consulting
Eugene A. Lanning
130 Hillside Terrace
Nebraska City, NE
68410-3740
ealanni@alltel.net
Member of AAAA
AAAA
The American Association
of Amateur Astronomers
P.O. Box 7981
Dallas, TX
75209-0981
e-Mail:
aaaa@astromax.com
www.AstroMax.com
| |
Project
Jupiter
VII. Observing
Suggestions
A. When to observe
The first Quad-A application of Project Jupiter is anticipated to be
the Fall of 2002. At that time Jupiter is well situated in the southern
sky early in the morning, and is high enough that even observers that
leave for work early in the morning can make a brief observation.
Project Jupiter may be performed at any time when Jupiter is suitable
for viewing over 3 weeks or more. Project Jupiter is not date sensitive,
and the Fall of 2002 is simply the first application of the Project.
B. How Often to Make Observations
Better estimates of the orbital period are attained with more
observational data. The observer is encouraged to not only observe when
the moon of Jupiter is at its maximum separation, but also to obtain
data for the smaller separations. For the more widely separated moons
(longer orbital period moons) each observer needs to make their
observations over at least one orbit, preferably more orbits. For the
outer moons, the observational dates may also be more widely spaced,
providing flexibility for the observer.
C. Observation guidance:
- Generally try to make around 12 observations, more if possible, but
cover at least one complete orbit (as judged by when it reaches the
maximum separations – resist the temptation to look up the orbital
period in a book! After all, this project is to find things for
ourselves, not look up information!).
The observations may be terminated before 12 to 18 sets are obtained if
the intermediate results produce an accuracy in determining the mass of
Jupiter that is acceptable to the observer.
- The observing sessions do not have to be on consecutive days. Even
when days are planned to be skipped, a skipped observing session due to
clouds
10
does not present a hindrance. The same
applies to personal affairs that may preclude observing on a given day.
- The observing sessions need not be equally spaced in time. The
program that processes the observing data compensates for skipped days,
irregular observation times of day, and so on.
- Make sure your data is for the same moon. As the moon of your choice
for project Jupiter nears Jupiter, its identity may be confused with the
other moons. It may be easier to measure and record separations for all
of the moons of Jupiter, or to start the observation sessions when the
selected moon is at its maximum separation. It is permissible to submit
data for more than one of Jupiter’s moons for this Project Jupiter, but
separate out the observation data for the different moons on separate
Attachment A forms.
- Transits in front of the planet reveal the different surface
brightness of the satellites themselves: Callisto and Ganymede very
dark, Io a faint grey, and Europa usually invisible against the bright
clouds. Therefore, visual recordings of a satellite in transit, while
possible, are not likely.
10 Record show that Galileo’s
observations of Jupiter’s moons on January 14, 1610 were not made because
it was cloudy. Clouds just do not respect anybody!
|
[Home] [Abstract] [I. Purpose] [II. Background] [III. Orbits] [IV. Period Determination] [V. Methods] [VI. Kepler's Laws] [VII. Observing Suggestions] [VIII. Data Gathering] [IX. Data Processing] [X. Observer's Data Results] [XI. Other Quad-A Results] [XII. Conclusions] [XIII. Attachments]
|